A Freezone Bible Supporter

Here is a complete Level 0 Academy pack from the 1970s
being posted in 11 parts.  Contents below following the
FZ Bible mission statement.

Much Love,

Tech Lover


**************************************************

FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


******** LEVEL ZERO ACADEMY COURSE PACK ********

Level 0 Academy Course Packs (2) circa 1974 and 1976,
Almost identical [Ed Note: differences noted like this]

Dark blue soft cardboard cover 
8 1/2 by 14 inch 4 hole punched & held together by 
double retainer clips. As issued by Pubs US.

This is complete including book excerpts but does not include
the complete book "Self Analysis" which is also part of the
level (it was posted to the internet last year).

This does not include transcripts of the level 0 tapes, but
we are working on those and will post them eventually.

Note that in the 1970s, HCOBs not written by Ron were converted
to BTBs (Board Technical Bulletins), resulting in the freequent
"reissued as BTB" designation.

Note that bulletins have a "distribution" near the top stating
where they are to be used.  A common distribution is "remimeo"
which means that the orgs may run copies on their mimeo machines.
Another, older, designation is "CenOcon" which means "Central
Orgs Continental".  Others such as "D of T" (director of training)
refer to posts in the Scientology organization.


********

CONTENTS:

part 1

01. BPL   26 JAN 72R  SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET
02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working
03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades
04. HCOB  11 JUN 64 New Student Data
05. HCOB  25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study
06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors
07. BPL   17 MAY 71RA r.13 NOV 72 r.10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions
08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing

part 2

09. HCOPL 15 DEC 65 Student's Guide To Acceptable Behavior
10. HCOPL 14 FEB 65 Safeguarding Technology
11. HCOB  27 SEP 66 The Anti-Social Personality
12. HCOPL 22 NOV 67 Rev. 18 JUL 70 Out Tech
13. HCOPL  8 JUN 70 Student Auditing
14. BPL   25 JUN 70RA Expanded Lower Grades
15. HCOB  25 SEP 71RA rev 4 APR 74 Tone Scale In Full
16. BTB   20 JUL 74 Basic Auditing Drills
17. HCOPL 14 OCT 68R rev 1 JAN 76 The Auditor's Code

part 3

18. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 25 JUL 74 Admin 14R The Worksheets
19. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 27 AUG 74 Admin 13R The Auditor Report Form
20. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 28 JUL 74 Admin 12R The Summary Report Form
21. BTB   20 JUN 70 reiss 21 JUL 74 Summary Report
22. BTB    6 NOV 72RA rev 20 NOV 74 Admin 11RA The Exam Report
23. HCOPL  8 MAR 71 Examiner's Form
24. BTB    5 NOV 72R rev 9 SEP 74 Admin 7R The Folder Summary
25. BTB   24 APR 69R rev 8 SEP 74 Preclear Assessment Sheet
26. HCOPL 23 APR 68 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms
27. HCOB  16 AUG 71 Training Drills Modernized

part 4

28. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA
29. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 
30. HCOB  15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2
31. HCOB  18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3
32. HCOB  29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist
33. HCOB  23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA
34. HCOB  21 OCT 68 Floating Needle
35. HCOB  11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC
36. HCOB  21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle
37. HCOB  20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena
38. HCOB   8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N
39. HCOB  21 MAR 74 End Phenomena
40. HCOB  14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything
41. HCOB  14 OCT 68 Meter Position
42. BTB   14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams"
43. HCOB  18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors
44. BTB   16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills
45. HCOB  11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check
46. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering
47. HCOB  10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching

part 5

48. HCOB   7 APR 64 Q And A
49. HCOB   3 AUG 65 Auditing Goofs Blowdown Interruption
50. HCOB   5 FEB 66 Letting The PC Itsa
51. HCOB   7 MAY 69 The Five GAEs
52. HCOB  17 MAY 69 TRs and Dirty Needles
53. BTB    4 JUL 69 r. 6 JUL 74 Auditing of OT 3 Preclears
54. BTB   17 JUL 69 r. 28 JUN 74 Flagrant Auditing Errors
55. HCOB  29 JUL 64 Good Indicators At Lower Levels
56. BTB   26 APR 69 r. 7 JUL 64 Bad Indicators
57. HCOPL  4 APR 72 rev. 7 APR 72 Ethics And Study Tech
58. HCOB  14 NOV 65 Clearing Commands
59. BTB    2 MAY 72R r. 10 JUN 74 Clearing Commands
60. BTB   18 NOV 68R r. 9 JUN 74 Model Session
61. HCOB  12 AUG 69 Flying Ruds
62. HCOB  23 AUG 71 (24 May 70 rev) Auditors Rights
63. HCOB   6 NOV 64 Styles of Auditing

part 6

64. HCOB  30 APR 71 Auditing Comm Cycle
65. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 2R The Two Parts Of Auditing
66. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 3 Three Important Comm Lines
67. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 4R Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle
68. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 5R The Comm Cycles In Auditing

part 7

69. HCOB  12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement
70. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand
71. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements
72. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives
73. HCOB  29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes
74. HCOB  17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions
75. BOOK  Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes

part 8

76. HCOB  16 FEB 59 Staff Auditor's Conference

part 9

77. HCOB  20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process
78. HCOB  16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running
79. HCOB   8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes
80. HCOB   9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two
81. HCOB  20 APR 60 Processes
82. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire
83. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills
84. BTB   15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads
85. BOOK  Creation of Human Ability R2-31
86. PAB    8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing

part 10

87. PAB   18 JUN 55 PAB 54 Reality Level of Preclear
88. HCOB  17 MAR 60 Standardized Sessions
89. HCOB   4 MAY 59 An Affinity Process
90. HCOB   2 MAR 61 New Pre-Hav Command
91. HCOB  25 SEP 59 HAS Co-Audit
92. HCOB  21 JUL 59 HGC Allowed Processes
93. BOOK   Creation of Human Ability R2-60
94. HCOB  13 OCT 59 D.E.I. Expanded Scale
95. HCOB   7 MAY 59 New Process Theory
96. BOOK   Scn 8-8008 6 Levels of Processing Issue 5
97. HCOB  11 DEC 64 Scientology 0 Processes
98. HCOB  26 DEC 64 Routine 0-A Expanded

part 11

99. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 29 JUL 74 Level 0 Drills
100. BTB  15 NOV 76 Grade Zero Processes - Quads

********

01. BPL   26 JAN 72R  SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET


B O A R D P O L I C Y L E T T E R

26 JANUARY 1972R ISSUE IV

REVISED AND REISSUED 11 OCTOBER 1974 AS BPL

CANCELS HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 JANUARY 1972 ISSUE IV SAME TITLE

SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET

( HRS ) Hubbard Recognised Scientologist

Remimeo
Scn Orgs 
Academies 
Level 0 
Students 

THIS COURSE CONTAINS KNOWLEDGE VITAL TO SUCCESSFUL LIVING.

PREREQUISITE: (1) Word Clearing Method 1 with all words
taken to FN.

(2) Applied Scholastics Basic Study Manual
( Unless the student has already done a non- 
superliterate Student Hat or PRD & 
M1 with each word fully cleared to FN.)

ORGANIZATION:_____________________________

STUDENT'S NAME:__________________________ POST:___________________

DATE STARTED:____________________ DATE COMPLETED:______________

This checksheet contains the vital survival knowledge of
Scientology Sub-Zero and Zero Level technology.

It covers the technology dealing with "memory" and "communication".

REQUIREMENTS:

Full Study Tech is to be used throughout this course.
Standard classroom Word Clearing methods are required. The
course is done fast flow per HCO PL 31 Aug 74 Issue II Fast
Flow Training Reinstated.

CERTIFICATE:

Completion of this checksheet entitles you to a
"Provisional Hubbard Recognized Scientologist Certificate".
A Provisional Certificate is only valid for one year at
which time it must be validated.

When you have completed through to Class IV training you
should Intern in this Organization under the professional
guidance of our Technical Experts. When you can then apply
the processes of the grade flublessly you will be awarded
your full permanent Hubbard Recognised Scientologist
Certificate.

For Classification a minimum of completing one person on
the Expanded Grade is required. This is best done on a 3
way Co-Audit where student A audit student B who audits
student C who audits student A.

Study the data in checksheet order. Do not go past a word
you do not understand. Use a dictionary and for Scientology
(R) terms, use a Scientology dictionary and refer to the
Symbols and Definitions list (HCOB 23 Aug 65 -
Abbreviations and Symbols of Dianetics (R) and Scientology).

* = 100% knowledge of and understanding and ability to apply.

Not starred = read and listened to the data and understanding of.

A demonstration of any of the materials may be requested to
give you full understanding of them.

The checksheet is one time through materials and practical.

WORD CLEARING METHOD NO. 1 TO END PHENOMENA HAS BEEN DONE, WITH

ALL WORDS TAKEN TO FN.

________________

A. ORIENTATION SECTION

* HCO PL 15 Jun 70 Keeping Scientology working ____ ____ ___

* HCO PL 17 Jun 70 Technical Degrades ____ ____ ___

* HCO PL 11 Jun 64 New Student Data ____ ____ ___

HCOB 25 Jun 71 The Three Barriers to Study ____ ____ ___

* HCO PL 31 May 68 Auditors ____ ____ ___

HCO PL 31 Aug 74 Fast Flow Training Re- instated ____ ____ ___


B. POINT SYSTEM

BPL 17 May 71 RA II Rev. 10 Jun 74 Study Points & Conditions ____ ____ ___


C. GENERAL COURSE DATA

* HCO PL 27 May 65 Processing ____ ____ ___

* HCO PL 15 Dec 65 Student's Guide to Acceptable Behaviour ____ ____ ___

* HCO PL 14 Feb 65 Safeguarding Technology Reissued 7 Jun 67 ____ ____ ___

HCO PL 27 Sep 66 The Anti- Social Personality ____ ____ ___

* HCO PL 22 Nov 67 Out Tech ____ ____ ___

* HCO PL 8 Jun 70 Student Auditing ____ ____ ___


D. BOOKS ( to be read by end of course )

Dianetics 55 ____ ____ ___

Self Analysis ____ ____ ___

Axioms & Logics ( Axioms Section ) ____ ____ ___


E. CHARTS

BPL 25 Jun 70R Classification & Gradation Chart Level 0 Section ____ ____ ___

HCOB 25 Sep 71R Tone Scale in Full Rev. 4 April 74 ____ ____ ___


DRILL :

REF: BTB 20 July 74 Auditor Expertise Drills
Series No. 1 Basic Drills

ED 3 Observing the Obvious Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___

ED 4 Observing the Obvious Bullbaited ____ ____ ___

ED 5 Learning the Tone Scale Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___

ED 6 Learning the Tone Scale Bullbaited ____ ____ ___

ED 7 Obnosis and the Tone Scale Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___

ED 8 Obnosis and the Tone Scale Bullbaited ____ ____ ___


F. CODES

* HCO PL 14 Oct 68 Auditors Code AD18 ____ ____ ___

* HCO PL 2 Nov 68 Auditors Code AD18 Additions ____ ____ ___

CLAY DEMO : Each point of the Auditors Code. ____ ____ ___


G. AUDITOR ADMIN SECTION

BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin series No. 14 The Worksheets ____ ____ ___

BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 13 Auditors Report Form ____ ____ ___

BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 12 Summary Report Form ____ ____ ___

BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 11 Exam Report ____ ____ ___

BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 7 Folder Summary ____ ____ ___

BTB 24 Apr 69R PC Assessment Sheet Rev. 8 Sept 74 ____ ____ ___

BPL 23 Apr 68 Parent/Guardian Consent Form ____ ____ ___

DRILL : Make up a " Dummy " PC Folder with all the proper
forms and worksheets filled out and in correct order
in the folder ____ ____ ___

DO IT : Check your PC's folder to see if the folder summary
is up to date and accurate ; if it is not, then bring it up
to date accurately ____ ____ ___

H. TRs

HCOB 16 Aug 71 Training Drills Modernised ____ ____ ___

CLAY DEMO: Axiom 28 ____ ____ ___

Listen to an LRH Demo tape of an Auditing Session before
and while drilling each TR. Listen specifically for the aspects
of TR 0 ( presence ), TR 1, TR 2, TR 3 and TR 4 for each Tr
as you get to it.

* OT TR 0 ____ ____ ____

* TR 0 ____ ____ ____

* TR 0 BB ____ ____ ____

* TR 1 ____ ____ ____

* TR 2 ____ ____ ____

* TR 3 ____ ____ ____

* TR 4 ____ ____ ____


I. FALSE__TA

* HCOB 24 Oct 71 False TA ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition 1 ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 15 Feb 72 False TA Addition 2 ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 18 Feb 72R False TA Addition 3 ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 29 Feb 72R False TA Checklist Rev. 23 Nov 73 ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 23 Nov 73 Dry and Wet Hands make False TA ____ ____ ___

DRILL : Identifying and handling False TA. ____ ____ ___


J . FN_DATA

* HCOB 21 Oct 68 Floating Needle ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 11 Feb 66 Free needles & how to get them on a PC ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 21 Sep 66 ARC Break Needle ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 20 Feb 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 8 Oct 70 Persistent FN ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 21 Mar 74 End Phenomena ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 14 Mar 71 FN Everything ____ ____ ___

CLAY DEMO : A full EP showing PC's Bank etc. ____ ____ ___


K. METER_DATA

* The Book "Introducing the E- Meter" ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 14 Oct 68 " You must never never . . ." ____ ____ ___

HCOB 11 May 69 Meter Trim Check ____ ____ ___

BTB 14 Jan 63 Rings causing Rockslams ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 18 Mar 74 E- Meter Sensitivity Errors ____ ____ ___


DRILL :

BTB 16 Jun 71 Advanced E - Meter Drills Trim Check Drill ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 11 May 69R Meter Trim Check Rev. 8 Jul 78 ____ ____ ___


L. METER_DRILLS

HCOB 23 May 71 IX Metering ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 10 Dec 65 E - Meter Coaching ____ ____ ___

* 1. ____ ____ ___ * 10. ____ ____ ___ * 19. ____ ____ ___

* 2. ____ ____ ___ * 11. ____ ____ ___ * 20. ____ ____ ___

* 3. ____ ____ ___ * 12. ____ ____ ___ * 21. ____ ____ ___

* 4. ____ ____ ___ * 13. ____ ____ ___

* 5. ____ ____ ___ * 14. ____ ____ ___

* 6. ____ ____ ___ * 15. ____ ____ ___

* 7. ____ ____ ___ * 16. ____ ____ ___

* 8. ____ ____ ___ * 17. ____ ____ ___

* 9. ____ ____ ___ * 18. ____ ____ ___


M. AUDITOR MUST NOTS

* HCOB 7 Apr 64 All Levels Q & A ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 3 Aug 65 Auditor Goofs - Blowdown Interuptions ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 5 Feb 66 II "Letting the PC Itsa" The 
Properly Trained Auditor ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 7 May 69 5 GAEs ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 17 May 69 TRs & Dirty Needles ____ ____ ___

BTB 4 July 69 Auditing of OT III Preclears ____ ____ ___

BTB 17 July 69 Flagrant Auditing Errors ____ ____ ___

* CLAY DEMO : 

(a) The 5 GAEs. ____ ____ ___
(b) The effect on the PC of Blowdown interuption. ____ ____ ___
(c) Three examples of Q & A. ____ ____ ___


N. INDICATORS

* HCOB 29 Jul 64 Good Indicators at Lower Levels ____ ____ ___

* BTB 26 Apr 69 Bad Indicators at Lower Levels ____ ____ ___

DRILLS: BTB 20 Jul 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series No. 1
Basic Auditing Drills

ED 13 Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___

ED 14 Bullbaited ____ ____ ___


O. MODEL SESSION & RUDIMENTS

* HCO PL 4 Apr 72R Ethics and Study Tech Rev. 7 Apr 72 ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 14 Nov 65 Clearing Commands ____ ____ ___

* BTB 2 May 72R Clearing Commands Rev. 10 Jun 74 ____ ____ ___

* BTB 18 Nov 68R Model Session ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 15 Aug 69 Flying Ruds ____ ____ ___

* BTB 11 Apr 74 Handling ARC Breaks ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 23 Aug 71 C/S Series No. 1 Auditors Rights ____ ____ ___

DRILLS: BTB 15 Dec 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series No. 2

Basic Sessions Actions Drills

ED 21 Flying Ruds Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___

ED 22 Flying Ruds Bullbaited ____ ____ ___

DO IT : Fly Ruds on another student; turn your PC's folder in
to the Academy C/S when done. ____ ____ ___


P. THEORY OF THE COMM CYCLE

HCOB 6 Nov 64 Styles of Auditing ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 30 Apr 71 Auditing Comm Cycle ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 23 May 71 II The 2 Parts of Auditing ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 23 May 71 III The Three Important Comm Lines ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 23 May 71 IV Communication Cycles
Within the Auditing Comm Cycle ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 23 May 71 V The Communication Cycle in Auditing ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 12 Jan 59 Tone of voice acknowledgements ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 17 Oct 62 Auditor Failure to Understand ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 7 Apr 65 Premature Acknowledgements ____ ____ ___

* HCO PL 1 Jul 65 Comm Cycle Additives ____ ____ ___

HCOB 29 Sep 65 Cyclical & Non-Cyclical
Process Conclusions ____ ____ ___


Q. TAPES

* 24 May 62 E-Meter Data: Instant Reads Part I ____ ____ ___

* 24 May 62 E-Meter Data: Instant Reads Part II ____ ____ ___

* 25 July 63 Comm Cycles in Auditing ____ ____ ___

* 6 Aug 63 Auditing Comm Cycles ____ ____ ___

* 20 Aug 63 Itsa Line ____ ____ ___

* 21 Aug 63 Itsa Line ( Cont'd ) ____ ____ ___

* 6 Feb 64 The Communication Cycle in Auditing ____ ____ ___

CLAY DEMO : 1. The Auditing Comm Cycle and what
happens in the bank. ____ ____ ___

2. Axiom 28. ( Ref: HCO PL 7 Apr 74
Ethics and Study Tech. ) ____ ____ ___

3. The purpose of Level 0. ____ ____ ___

4. The Full End Phenomena of Grade 0 Ability Attained. ____ ____ ___


R. ARC STRAIGHTWIRE PROCESSES

NOTE: See HCOB 17 Mar 74 TWC Checksheets. " TWC Using
Wrong Questions " before studying, Drilling and using the
processes.

USE: BTB 9 Oct 71R ARC Straightwire Drills ____ ____ ___


REMEMBER SOMETHING

* BOOK: Dianetics 55! Chapter on Six Basic Processes ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-1 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-2 ____ ____ ___


RECALL A TIME

* HCOB 16 Feb 59 Staff Auditors Conference ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-3 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-4 ____ ____ ___


COMM RECALL PROCESS

* HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-5 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-6 ____ ____ ___


THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS

* HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-7 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-8 ____ ____ ___


EXHAUSTION

* HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-9 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-10 ____ ____ ___


PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE

* HCOB 16 Feb 59 HGC Processes for Those Trained in Engram 
Running ( applicable parts only ) ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 16 Feb 59 Staff Auditors Conference ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-11 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-12 ____ ____ ___


FORGETTING SIX WAY BRACKET

* HCOB 8 Apr 58 A Pair of Processes ____ ____ ___

PAB 143 ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-13 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-14 ____ ____ ___


CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE

* HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure
Step Two HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 20 Apr 60 Processes ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-15 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-16 ____ ____ ___


DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE

* HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure

Step Two HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-17 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-18 ____ ____ ___


KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS

* HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___

* BOOK: Scientology 0 - 8 Expanded Know to Mystery Scale
____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-19 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-20 ____ ____ ___


SELF ANALYSIS

BOOK: Self Analysis * and run per instructions
in book, Lists 1 - 12 ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-21 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-22 ____ ____ ___


ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES

* HCOB 27 Sep 68 ARC Straightwire ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-23 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-24 ____ ____ ___


HAVINGNESS

BTB 4 Jan 72R 0 - IV Expanded Grades Processes - Triples Part A
Rev. 28 June 74 ARC Straightwire Havingness ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-25 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-26 ____ ____ ___



S. LEVEL 0 PROCESSES

BTB 5 Jan 72R Grade 0 Processes

USE: BTB 9 Oct 71R Level 0 Drills ____ ____ ___


R2-31 BEINGNESS PROCESSING

* BOOK Creation of Human Ability - R2-31 ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-27 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-28 ____ ____ ___


AXIOM 51 COMM PROCESSING

* PAB 56 ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-29 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-30 ____ ____ ___


PAB 54 COMM PROCESS

* PAB 54 ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-31 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-32 ____ ____ ___


AN OBVIOUS BASIC PROCESS

* HCOB 17 Mar 60 Standardised Sessions ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-33 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-34 ____ ____ ___


AN AFFINITY PROCESS

* HCOB 4 May 59 An Affinity Process ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-35 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-36 ____ ____ ___


IN SEQUENCE

* HCOB 2 MAR 61 New Pre-hav Command ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-37 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-38 ____ ____ ___


UNIVERSE PROCESSING

* HCOB 25 Sep 59 HAS Co-Audit ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-39 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-40 ____ ____ ___


LOCATIONAL BODY COMM

* HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-41 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-42 ____ ____ ___


A CLEARING PROCEDURE

* HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-43 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-44 ____ ____ ___


PROCESS S-2

* HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-45 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-46 ____ ____ ___


R2-60 THE HIDDEN COMMUNICATION

* BOOK: Creation of Human Ability - R2-60 ____ ____ ___

* BOOK: Scientology 0 - 8 ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-47 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-48 ____ ____ ___


R2-60 KNOW TO MYSTERY PROCESS

* BOOK: Creation of Human Ability - R2-60 ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-49 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-50 ____ ____ ___


EXPANDED CDEI COMM PROCESS

* HCOB 13 Oct 59 DEI Expanded Scale ____ ____ ___

* BOOK: Scientology 0 - 8 ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-51 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-52 ____ ____ ___


LOCATIONAL COMM PROCESS

* HCOB 7 May 59 New Process ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-53 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-54 ____ ____ ___


REMEDY OF COMM SCARCITY

* BOOK: 8 - 8008 ( six levels of processing ) ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-55 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-56 ____ ____ ___


GRADE ZERO TRIPLE

* HCOB 11 Dec 64 Scientology 0 Processes ____ ____ ___

* HCOB 26 Dec 64 Routine 0- A Expanded ____ ____ ___

BTB 5 Jan 72R 0 - IV Expanded Grade

Processes Triples Part B

Grade 0 Triple Processes ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-57 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-58 ____ ____ ___


HAVINGNESS

BTB 5 Jan 72R Grade 0 Processes

Havingness Process ____ ____ ___

DRILL: TR 00-59 ____ ____ ___

TR 00-60 ____ ____ ___


T. AUDITING SECTION

Audit a minimum of one person to Expanded
Grade 0 Release ____ ____ ___

STUDENT ATTEST : _________________________ DATE: ____________________

ACADEMY C/S : ____________________________ DATE: ____________________


U. STUDENT COMPLETION

I have completed the requirements of this checksheet and I
know and can apply this material.

STUDENT ATTEST : _______________________ DATE: ____________________


V. SUPERVISOR

I have trained this student to the best of my ability and
he/she has completed the requirements of this checksheet
and knows and can apply the checksheet data.

SUPERVISOR : ____________________________ DATE: ____________________


W. STUDENT ATTEST AT C&A

I attest:

A. I have enroled on the course.

B. I have paid for the course.

C. I have studied and understand all the materials
on the checksheet.

D. I have done all the drills on this checksheet.

E. I can produce an Expanded Grade 0 Release.


STUDENT ATTEST : ________________________ DATE: ___________________

C&A : _______________________________________


X. CERTS AND AWARDS

Provisional Class 0 Certificate issued.

C&A : _____________________________________ DATE:____________________

Route to Course Admin for filing in the students folder.


Training and Services Aide
Revised by
W/O Ron Shafran, CS-4
and Flag Mission 1234
Reissued as BPL
by Flag Mission 1234
I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis
2nd: Molly Harlow
Authorised by AVU
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY

BDCS:HH:BW:RS:AL:MH:mh 
Copyright c 1972, 1974 
by L. Ron Hubbard 
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 

********

02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 FEBRUARY 1965

REISSUED 15 JUNE 1970

(Corrected per Flag Issue 28.1.73)

Remimeo 
Sthil Students
Assn/Org Sec Hat
HCO Sec Hat
Case Sup Hat
Ds of P Hat
Ds of T Hat
Staff Member Hat
Franchise
(issued May 1965)

Note: Neglect of this Pol Ltr has caused great hardship on
staffs, has cost countless millions and made it necessary
in 1970 to engage in an all out International effort to
restore basic Scientology over the world. Within 5 years
after the issue of this PL with me off the lines, violation
had almost destroyed orgs. "Quickie grades" entered in and
denied gain to tens of thousands of cases. Therefore
actions which neglect or violate this Policy Letter are
HIGH CRIMES resulting in Comm Evs on ADMINISTRATORS and
EXECUTIVES. It is not "entirely a tech matter" as its
neglect destroys orgs and caused a 2 year slump. IT IS THE
BUSINESS OF EVERY STAFF MEMBER to enforce it.

ALL LEVELS

KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING

HCO Sec or Communicator Hat Check
on all personnel and new personnel
as taken on.


We have some time since passed the point of achieving
uniformly workable technology.

The only thing now is getting the technology applied.

If you can't get the technology applied then you can't
deliver what's promised. It's as simple as that. If you can
get the technology applied, you can deliver what's promised.

The only thing you can be upbraided for by students or pcs
is "no results". Trouble spots occur only where there are
"no results". Attacks from governments or monopolies occur
only where there are "no results" or "bad results".

Therefore the road before Scientology is clear and its
ultimate success is assured if the technology is applied.

So it is the task of the Assn or Org Sec, the HCO Sec, the
Case Supervisor, the D of P, the D of T and all staff
members to get the correct technology applied.

Getting the correct technology applied consists of:

One: Having the correct technology.

Two: Knowing the technology.

Three: Knowing it is correct.

Four: Teaching correctly the correct technology.

Five: Applying the technology.

Six: Seeing that the technology is correctly applied.

Seven: Hammering out of existence incorrect technology.

Eight: Knocking out incorrect applications.

Nine: Closing the door on any possibility of incorrect technology.

Ten: Closing the door on incorrect application.

One above has been done.

Two has been achieved by many.

Three is achieved by the individual applying the correct
technology in a proper manner and observing that it works
that way.

Four is being done daily successfully in most parts of the world.

Five is consistently accomplished daily.

Six is achieved by instructors and supervisors consistently.

Seven is done by a few but is a weak point.

Eight is not worked on hard enough.

Nine is impeded by the "reasonable" attitude of the not
quite bright.

Ten is seldom done with enough ferocity.

Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are the only places Scientology
can bog down in any area.

The reasons for this are not hard to find. (a) A weak
certainty that it works in Three above can lead to weakness
in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. (b) Further, the
not-too-bright have a bad point on the button
Self-Importance. (c) The lower the IQ, the more the
individual is shut off from the fruits of observation. (d)
The service facs of people make them defend themselves
against anything they confront good or bad and seek to make
it wrong. (e) The bank seeks to knock out the good and
perpetuate the bad.

Thus, we as Scientologists and as an organization must be
very alert to Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.

In all the years I have been engaged in research I have
kept my comm lines wide open for research data. I once had
the idea that a group could evolve truth. A third of
Century has thoroughly disabused me of that idea. Willing
as I was to accept suggestions and data, only a handful of
suggestions (less than twenty) had long run value and none
were major or basic; and when I did accept major or basic
suggestions and used them, we went astray and I repented
and eventually had to "eat crow".

On the other hand there have been thousands and thousands
of suggestions and writings which, if accepted and acted
upon, would have resulted in the complete destruction of
all our work as well as the sanity of pcs. So I know what a
group of people will do and how insane they will go in
accepting unworkable "technology". By actual record the
percentages are about twenty to 100,000 that a group of
human beings will dream up bad technology to destroy good
technology. As we could have gotten along without
suggestions, then, we had better steel ourselves 
to continue to do so now that we have made it.
This point will, of course, be attacked as "unpopular"
"egotistical" and "undemocratic". It very well may be. But
it is also a survival point And I don't see that popular
measures, self- abnegation and democracy have done anything
for Man but push him further into the mud. Currently,
popularity endorse degraded novels, self- abnegation has
filled the South East Asian jungles with stone idols and
corpses, and democracy has given us inflation and income tax.

Our technology has not been discovered by a group. True, if
the group had no supported me in many ways I could not have
discovered it either. But it remains that in its formative
stages it was not discovered by a group, then group
efforts, one can safely assume, will not add to it or
successfully alter it in the future. I can only say this
now that it is done.

There remains, of course, group tabulation or co-ordination
of what has been done, which will be valuable-only so long
as it does not seek to alter basic principles and
successful applications.

The contributions that were worth while in this period of
forming the technology were help in the form of friendship,
of defence, of organization, of dissemination, of
application, of advices on results and of finance. These
were great contributions and were, and are, appreciated.
Many thousands contributed in this way and made us what we
are. Discovery contribution was not however part of the
broad picture.

We will not speculate here on why this was so or how I came
to rise above the bank.

We are dealing only in facts and the above is a fact-the
group left to its own devices would not have evolved
Scientology but with wild dramatization of the bank called
"new ideas" would have wiped it out. Supporting this is the
fact that Man has never before evolved workable mental
technology and emphasizing it is the vicious technology he
did evolve-psychiatry, psychology, surgery, shock
treatment, whips, duress, punishment, etc, ad infinitum.

So realize that we have climbed out of the mud by whatever
good luck and good sense, and refuse to sink back into it
again. See that Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten above are
ruthlessly followed and we will never be stopped. Relax
them, get reasonable about it and we will perish.

So far, while keeping myself in complete communication with
all suggestions, I have not failed on Seven, Eight, Nine
and Ten in areas I could supervise closely. But it's not
good enough for just myself and a few others to work at this.

Whenever this control as per Seven, Eight. Nine and Ten has
been relaxed the whole organizational area has failed.
Witness Elizabeth, N.l., Wichita, the early organizations
and groups. They crashed only because I no longer did
Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. Then, when they were all messed
up you saw the obvious "reasons" for failure. But ahead of
that they ceased to deliver and that involved them in other
reasons.

The common denominator of a group is the reactive bank.
Thetans without banks have different responses. They only
have their banks in common. They agree then only on bank
principles. Person to person the bank is identical. So
constructive ideas are individual and seldom get broad
agreement in a human group. An individual must rise above
an avid craving for agreement from a humanoid group to get
anything decent done. The bank-agreement has been what has
made Earth a Hell-and if you were looking for Hell and
found Earth, it would certainly serve. War, famine, agony
and disease has been the lot of Man. Right now the great
governments of Earth have developed the means of frying
every Man, Woman and Child on the planet. That is Bank.
That is the result of Collective Thought Agreement. The
decent, pleasant things on this planet come from individual
actions and ideas that have somehow gotten by the Group
Idea. For that matter, look how we ourselves are attacked
by "public opinion" media.

Yet there is no more ethical group on this planet than ourselves.

Thus each one of us can rise above the domination of the
bank and then, as a group of freed beings, achieve freedom
and reason. It is only the aberrated group, the mob, that
is destructive.

When you don't do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten actively, you
are working for the Bank dominated mob. For it will surely,
surely (a) introduce incorrect technology and swear by it,
(b) apply technology as incorrectly as possible, (c) open
the door to any destructive idea, and (d) encourage
incorrect application.

It's the Bank that says the group is all and the individual
nothing. It's the Bank that says we must fail.

So just don't play that tune. Do Seven. Eight, Nine and Ten
and you will knock out of your road all the future thorns.

Here's an actual example in which a senior executive had to
interfere because of a pc spin: A Case Supervisor told
Instructor A to have Auditor B run Process X on Preclear C.

Auditor B afterwards told Instructor A that "It didn't
work." Instructor A was weak on Three above and didn't
really believe in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. So Instructor
A told the Case Supervisor "Process X didn't work on
Preclear C." Now this strikes directly at each of One to
Six above in Preclear C, Auditor B, Instructor A and the
Case Supervisor. It opens the door to the introduction of
"new technology" and to failure.

What happened here? Instructor A didn't jump down Auditor
B's throat, that's all that happened. This is what he
should have done: Grabbed the Auditor's report and looked
it over, When a higher executive on this case did so she
found what the Case Supervisor and the rest missed: that.
Process X increased Preclear C's TA to 25 TA divisions for
the session but that near session end Auditor B Qed and Aed
with a cognition and abandoned Process X while it still
gave high TA and went off running one of Auditor B's own
manufacture, which nearly spun Preclear C. Auditor B's IQ
on examination turned out to be about 75. Instructor A was
found to have huge ideas of how you must never invalidate
anyone, even a lunatic. The Case Supervisor was found to be
"too busy with admin to have any time for actual cases".

All right, there's an all too typical example. The
Instructor should have done Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.
This would have begun this way. Auditor B: "That process X
didn't work." Instructor A: "What exactly did you do
wrong?" Instant attack. "Where's your auditor's report for
the session? Good. Look here, you were getting a lot of TA
when you stopped Process X. What did you do?" Then the Pc
wouldn't have come close to a spin and all four of these
would have retained certainty.

In a year, I had four instances in one small group where
the correct process recommended was reported not to have
worked. But on review found that each one had (a) increased
the TA, (b) had been abandoned, and (c) had been falsely
reported as unworkable.

Also, despite this abuse, in each of these four cases the
recommended, correct process cracked the case. Yet they
were reported as not having worked!

Similar examples exist in instruction and these are all the
more deadly as every time instruction in correct technology
is flubbed, then the resulting error, uncorrected in the
auditor, is perpetuated on every pc that auditor audits
thereafter. So Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are even more
important in a course than in supervision of cases.

Here's an example: A rave recommendation is given a
graduating student "because he gets more TA on pcs than any
other student on the course!" Figures of 435 TA divisions a
session are reported. "Of course his model session is poor
but it's just knack he has" is also included in the
recommendation. A careful review is undertake because
nobody at levels O to IV is going to get that much TA on
pcs. It is found that this student was never taught to read
an E-Meter dial! And no instructor observed his handling of
a meter and it was not discovered that he "overcompensated"
nervously swinging the TA 2 or 3 divisions beyond where it
needed to go to place the needle at "set". So everyone was
about to throw away standard processes and model session
because this one student "got such remarkable TA". They
only read the reports and listened to the brags and never
looked at this student. The pcs in actual fact were making
slightly less than average gain, impeded by a rough model
session and misworded processes.

Thus, what was making the pcs win (actual Scientology) was
hidden under a lot of departures and errors.

I recall one student who was squirreling on an Academy
course and running a lot of off-beat whole track on other
students after course hours. The academy students were in a
state of electrification on all these new experiences and
weren't quickly brought under control and the student
himself never was given the works on Seven, Eight, Nine and
Ten so they stuck.

Subsequently, this student prevented another squirrel from
being straightened out and his wife died of cancer
resulting from physical abuse. A hard, tough instructor at
that moment could have salvaged two squirrels and saved the
life of a girl. But no, students had a right to do whatever
they pleased.

Squirreling (going off into weird practices or altering
Scientology) only comes about from non-comprehension.
Usually the non-comprehension is not of Scientology but
some earlier contact with an off-beat humanoid practice
which in its turn was not understood.

When people can't get results from what they think is
standard practice, they can be counted upon to squirrel to
some degree. The most trouble in the past two years came
from orgs where an executive in each could not assimilate
straight Scientology under instruction in Scientology they
were unable to define terms or demonstrate examples of
principles. And the orgs where they were got into plenty of
trouble. And worse, it could not be straightened out easily
because neither one of these people could or would
duplicate instructions. hence, a debacle resulted in two
places, directly traced to failures of instruction earlier.
So proper instruction is vital. The D of T and his
Instructors and all Scientology Instructors must be
merciless in getting Four, Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten into
effective action. That one student, dumb and impossible
though he may seem and of no use to anyone, may yet some
day be the cause of untold upset because nobody was
interested enough to make sure Scientology got home to him.

With what we know now, there is no student we enrol who
cannot be properly trained.

As an instructor, one should be very alert to slow progress
and should turn the sluggards inside out personally. No
system will do it, only you or me with our sleeve rolled up
can crack the back of bad studenting and we can only do it
on an individual student, never on a whole class only. He's
slow = something is awful wrong. Take fast action to
correct it. Don't wait until next week. By then he's got
other messes stuck to him. If you can't graduate them with
their good sense appealed to and wisdom shining graduate
them in such a state of shock they'll have nightmares if
they contemplate squirreling. Then experience will
gradually bring about Three in them and they'll know better
than to chase butterflies when they should be auditing.

When somebody enrols, consider he or she has joined up for
the duration of the universe- never permit an "open-minded"
approach. If they're going to quit let then quit fast. If
they enroled, they're aboard, and if they're aboard,
they're here on the same terms as the rest of us- win or
die in the attempt. Never let them be half-minded about
being Scientologists. The finest organizations in history
have been tough dedicated organizations. Not one
namby-pamby bunch of panty-waist dilettantes have ever made
anything. It's a tough universe. The social veneer makes it
seem mild. But only the tigers survive-and even they have a
hard time. We'll survive because we are tough and are
dedicated. When we do instruct somebody properly he becomes
more and more tiger. When we instruct half-mindedly and are
afraid to offend, scared to enforce, we don't make students
into good Scientologists and that let's everybody down.

When Mrs. Pattycake comes to us to be taught, turn that
wandering doubt in he eye into a fixed, dedicated glare and
she'll win and we'll all win. Humour her and we all die a
little. The proper instruction attitude is, "You're here so
you're a Scientologist Now we're going to make you into an
expert auditor no matter what happens. We'd rather have you
dead that incapable." Fitting that into the economics of
the situation and lack of adequate time and you see the
cross we have to bear.

But we won't have to bear it forever. The bigger we get the
more economics and time we will have to do our job. And the
only things which can prevent us from getting that big fast
are areas in from One to Ten. Keep those in mind and we'll
be able to grow. Fast. And as we grow our shackles will be
less and less. Failing to keep One to Ten, will make us
grow less.

So the ogre which might eat us up is not the government or
the High Priests. It's our possible failure to retain and
practise our technology.

An Instructor or Supervisor or Executive must challenge
with ferocity instances of "unworkability". They must
uncover what did happen, what was run and what was done or
not done.

If you have One and Two, you can only acquire Three for all
by making sure of all the rest.

We're not playing some minor game in Scientology. It isn't
cute or something to do for lack of something better.

The whole agonized future of this planet, every Man, Woman
and Child on it, and your own destiny for the next endless
trillions of years depends on what you do here and now with
and in Scientology.

This is a deadly serious activity. And if we miss getting
out of the trap now, we may never again have another chance.

Remember, this is a our first chance to do so in all the
endless trillions of years of the past. Don't muff it now
because it seems unpleasant or unsocial to do Seven, Eight,
Nine and Ten.

Do them and we'll win.

L. RON HUBBARD

Founder

LRH:jw.rr.nt.rd

Copyright c 1965, 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

********

03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970

Remimeo
Applies to all
SHs and 
Academies 
Franchises

URGENT AND IMPORTANT

TECHNICAL DEGRADES

(This PL and HCO PL Feb 7, 1965 must be made part of every
study pack as the first items and must be listed on
checksheets. )

Any checksheet in use or in stock which carries on it any
degrading statement must be destroyed and issued without
qualifying statements.

Example: Level 0 to IV Checksheets SH carry "A. Background
Material - This section is included as an historical
background, but has much interest and value to the student.
Most of the processes are no longer used, having been
replaced by more modern technology. The student is only
required to read this material and ensure he leaves no
misunderstood." This heading covers such vital things as
TRs, Op Pro by Dup! The statement is a falsehood.

These checksheets were not approved by myself, all the
material of the Academy and SH courses IS in use.

Such actions as this gave us "Quickie Grades", ARC Broke
the field and downgraded the Academy and SH Courses.

A condition of TREASON or cancellation of certificates or
dismissal and a full investigation of the background of any
person found guilty, will be activated in the case of
anyone committing the following HIGH CRIMES.

1. Abbreviating an official Course in Dianetics and
Scientology so as to lose the full theory, processes and
effectiveness of the subjects.

2. Adding comments to checksheets or instructions labelling
any material "background" or "not used now" or "old" or any
similar action which will result in the student not
knowing, using, and applying the data in which he is being
trained.

3. Employing after 1 Sept 1970 any checksheet for any
course not authorized by myself and the SO Organizing
Bureau Flag.

4. Failing to strike from any checksheet remaining in use
meanwhile any such comments as "historical", "background",
"not used", "old", etc. or VERBALLY STATING IT TO STUDENTS.

5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a
time on the pc's own determinism without hint or evaluation.

6. Running only one process for a grade between 0 to IV.

7. Failing to use all processes for a level.

8. Boasting as to speed of delivery in a session, such as
"I put in Grade zero in 3 minutes." Etc.

9. Shortening time of application of auditing for financial
or laborsaving considerations.

10. Acting in any way calculated to lose the technology of
Dianetics and Scientology to use or impede its use or
shorten its materials or its application.

REASON: The effort to get students through courses and get
pcs processed in orgs was considered best handled by
reducing materials or deleting processes from grades. The
pressure exerted to speed up student completions and
auditing completions was mistakenly answered by just not
delivering.

The correct way to speed up a student's progress is by
using 2 way comm and applying the study materials to students.

The best way to really handle pcs is to ensure they make
each level fully before going on to the next and repairing
them when they do not.

The puzzle of the decline of the entire Scientology network
in the late 60s is entirely answered by the actions taken
to shorten time in study and in processing by deleting
materials and actions.

Reinstituting full use and delivery of Dianetics and
Scientology is the answer to any recovery.

The product of an org is well taught students and
thoroughly audited pcs. When the product vanishes, so does
the org. The orgs must survive for the sake of this planet.

L. RON HUBBARD

Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright c 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

********

04. HCOB  11 JUN 64 New Student Data


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 JUNE 1964

Sthil Students

NEW STUDENTS DATA

STAR RATED FOR NEW STUDENTS


Tape Passes

On those live lectures you hear, when you take the Friday
tape examination and keep your exam paper when it is handed
back, and present it to Theory as evidence, any live
lecture you have so heard is credited on your check sheet
by Theory where the lecture appears on the check sheet.

Not all the lectures I give appear later on check sheets
but many do and you should get credit for those you have heard.

If you have a Friday exam paper on any lecture you have
heard live and the grade is above 90% for star rated and
above 75% for a 75, any grade for a zero rate, if the
lecture appears as a tape on your check sheets it will be
marked off as passed and initialled by a Theory Instructor.


Auditing Assignments

In auditing before the Level VI Co-audit, it is customary
to split up teams that will eventually co-audit to OT.

The reasons for this are

1. Auditing skill tends to become adapted to one pc and
deteriorate. This does not make a good pro, it makes only a
co- auditor. I'm making you into a pro, not a co auditor
regardless of classification status. I can't do that by
giving you just the pc you are already educated to run.
You'd be a one pc auditor.

2. Mutual withholds develop in teams and restrain auditing results.

3. Your auditing skill tends to look better or worse than it is.

We don't even wholly guarantee you and your co-auditor that
you will co-audit in the Level Vl Co-audit for one team
member may be Case type A and the other B. A Case type A
can run through anything. A Case type B stops at a comma.
Thus one gets too far out of pace with the other and it's
just too hard on one member of the team who would be, of
course, the Type B and already in trouble. It would be
selfish indeed of a Type A to force a Type B to run GPMs
far beyond where he or she has had them run. We will try to
put the team together in this Level VI Co-audit and mostly
do but this AB factor is a technical one and we can't do
anything about it short of good auditing.


Student Rules

A lot of students come a cropper on the rules and try to
carry on without concurrence.

You are only here for a few months. In your hands is your
next multi-trillion years.

The rules are there to get you through. Breaking them, in
my opinion, is too pricey.


Rapidity of Progress

A few new students arrive here in a high state of "know it
all, just want a few new gimmicks".

Students who have this state of mind just don't learn or
progress. And they really get stuck in. We're not doing it
to them. They are trying to learn over the top of their own
postulate that they already know it (when they don't) and
so get into a ridge. They're not stuck in the course.
They're stuck in this conflict.

In the first place, no new student at Saint Hill has ever
been known to give a standard session on arrival, despite
all the data being available. But they don't know enough
about auditing to know whether they're doing well or not,
much less know how to audit. Factually they usually look
pretty pitiful. There they are making Gross Auditing Errors
in an avalanche, missing comm cycles, feet in the pc's face
with their meter upside down, telling the Class Vl auditor
who is his Instructor "I know all about it. We had a course
in Slobovia much better than this one. The pcs audited the
auditor and it . . . ."

Well you can't blame the instructor if he seems to be
having a hard time to keep from laughing in the new
student's face. It's only their courtesy that keeps them
from reaching over and connecting the unconnected cans this
new genius has failed to plug into the meter as a fitting
touche.

Some auditors trained elsewhere with great ARC but precious
little "do it", don't have enough training to know they
aren't trained. And it's always the very worst trained
auditors who how; the loudest about how they don't need to
know. The majority relaxedly study and improve their skill,
get results and there it is.

I myself periodically study auditing and put a polish on my
own skill. I don't have to say "I don't know", but I'm not
so arrogant as to believe I'm above knowing how to do things.

So if every year or two I can study how to audit without
going into a long rigmarole about how I'm above all that, I
can reasonably expect others to have a sane view of their
own skill too.

Any skill can be improvedone can know more about an
subjectunless one has already decided he or she already
knows all about it.

The successful progress of a student is inversely
proportional to the student preconception of knowing it
already. An arrogant assumption of total knowing without
inspection is the surest way to make no progress.

One does or does not know the data before him. That's
elementary. Why should it become involved with emotionalism?

The fast student is not concerned with necessities to
maintain status by asserting how much he or she already
knows. The fast student is only interested in knowing what
he does not know, studying it and then knowing that he
knows it.

The slow student is so busy putting on that he knows that
he never finds out he doesn't in fact know. To do this
before a lot of experts such as Saint Hill Instructors
seems pretty pointless.

Results today are by the text book. Lack of results are
always attended by departures.

One can or cannot get results with auditing. This means
that one is or is not doing a text book job.

In our case the text book has 14 years of hard won
experience behind it. So text book auditing gets the best
results. It's that simple.

The statement "I know all about Scientology but I don't get
very good results" is a pretty silly statement today. It's
saying in fact "I pretend to more than I know and the flubs
show up in my results".

Well, that's getting right down to the reasons for slow
progress and calling a spade a spade, but it's awful true.
It's really the only reason back of slow progress on course.

The speed with which you complete your course and get to OT
is entirely regulated by the speed with which you discover
there's something here to learn.

Most students handle this very early. I'm sure you will.

I give you my good wishes for a fast progress.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:nt.rd
Copyright c 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

********

05. HCOB  25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 25 JUNE 1971 R
REVISED 25 NOVEMBER 1974

Remimeo 
Tech & Qual
All Students
Supervisors Word Clearing Series 3R
Supervisor's Course
Cramming
Word Clearers


BARRIERS TO STUDY

There are three different sets of physiological and mental
reactions that come from 3 different aspects of study. They
are three different sets of symptoms.

( 1 ) Education in the absence of the mass in which the
technology will be involved is very hard on the student.

It actually makes him feel squashed. Makes him feel bent,
sort of spinny, sort of dead, bored, exasperated.

If he is studying the doingness of something in which the
mass is absent this will be the result.

Photographs help and motion pictures would do pretty good
as they are a sort of promise or hope of the mass but the
printed page and the spoken word are not a substitute for a
tractor if he's studying about tractors.

You have to understand this data in its purityand that is
that educating a person in a mass that they don't have and
which isn't available produces physiological reactions.
That is what I am trying to teach you.

It's just a fact.

You're trying to teach this fellow all about tractors and
you're not giving him any tractorswell he's going to wind
up with a face that feels squashed, with headaches and with
his stomach feeling funny. He's going to feel dizzy from
time to time and very often his eyes are going to hurt.

It's a physiological datum that has to do with processing
and the field of the mind.

You could therefore expect the greatest incidence of
suicide or illness in that field of education most devoted
to studying absent masses.

This one of studying the something without its mass ever
being around produces the most distinctly recognizable
reactions.

If a child felt sick in the field of study and it were
traced back to this one, the positive remedy would be to
supply the massthe object or a reasonable substitute and
it would clear it up.

(2) There is another series of physiological phenomena that
exist which is based on the fact of too steep a study gradient.

That's another source of physiological study reaction
because of too steep a gradient.

It is a sort of a confusion or a reelingness that goes with
this one.

You've hit too steep a gradient.

There was too much of a jump because he didn't understand
what he was doing and he jumped to the next thing and that
was too steep and he went too fast and he will assign all
of his difficulties to this new thing.

Now differentiate herebecause gradients sounds terribly
like the 3rd one of these study hang-ups, definitionsbut
remember that they are quite distinctly different.

Gradients are more pronounced in the field of doingness but
they still hang over into the field of understanding. In
gradients however it is the actions we are interested in.
We have a plotted course of forward motion of actions. We
find he was terribly confused on the second action he was
supposed to do. We must assume then that he never really
got out of the first one.

The remedy for this one of too steep a gradient is cutting
back. Find out when he was not confused on the gradient,
then what new action he undertook to do. Find what action
he understood well. Just before he was all confused what
did he understand welland then we find out that he didn't
understand it well.

It's really at the tail end of what he understood and then
he went over the gradient you see.

It is most recognizable and most applicable in the field of
doingness.

That's the gradient barrier and one full set of phenomena
accompanies that.

(3) There is this third one. An entirely different set of
physiological reactions brought about througha bypassed
definition. A bypassed definition gives one a distinctly
blank feeling or a washed-out feeling. A not-there feeling
and a sort of nervous hysteria will follow in the back of that.

The manifestation of "blow" stems from this 3rd aspect of
study which is the misunderstood definition or the not
comprehended definition, the undefined word.

That's the one that produces the blow.

The person doesn't necessarily blow on these other twothey
are not pronouncedly blow phenomena. They are simply
physiological phenomena.

This one of the misunderstood definition is so much more
important. It's the make-up of human relations, the mind
and subjects. It establishes aptitude and lack of aptitude
and it's what psychologists have been trying to test for
years without recognizing what it was.

It's the definitions of words.

The misunderstood word.

That's all it goes back to and that produces such a vast
panorama of mental effects that it itself is the prime
factor involved with stupidity and the prime factor
involved with many other things.

If a person didn't have misunderstoods his talent might or
might not be present but his doingness would be present.

We can't say that Joe would paint as well as Bill if both
were unaberrated in the field of art, but we can say that
the inability of Joe to paint compared with the ability of
Joe to do the motions of painting is dependent exclusively
and only upon definitionsexclusively and only upon
definitions.

There is some word in the field of art that the person who
is inept didn't define or understand and that is followed
by an inability to act in the field of the arts.

That's very important because it tells you what happens to
doingness and that the restoration of doingness depends
only upon the restoration of understanding on the
misunderstood wordmisunderstood definition.

This is very fast processing. There is a very swift wide
big result obtainable in this.

It has a technology which is a very simple technology.

It enters in at the lower levels because it has to. This
doesn't mean it is unimportant, it means it has to be at
the entrance gates of Scientology.

It IS a sweepingly fantastic discovery in the field of
education and don't neglect it.

You can trace back the subject a person is dumb in or any
allied subject that got mixed up with it. The psychologist
doesn't understand Scientology. He never understood a word
in psychology so he doesn't understand Scientology.

Well that opens the gate to Education. Although I've given
this one of the misunderstood definition last it is the
most important one.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nt.rdjh
Copyright c 1971, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

********

06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 31 MAY 1968

Issue II

(Reissued from Flag Order 808)

Remimeo

AUDITORS

Auditors have since the first session of Scientology been
the only individual on this planet, in this Universe
capable of freeing man.

An Auditor is one who has been trained in the technology of
Scientology. An Auditor applies standard technology to
pre-clears.

At times some will forget or chose to ignore the fact that
the Auditor is not just another fellow or a guy who works
in Scientology. An Auditor is a highly trained specialist,
no matter what level of Auditor. He or she is the only one
who can give man the truth, that man knows.

An Auditor is to be respected. An Auditor is very important
in Clearing this Planet, and this Universe. It's a big job
and the Auditor will do it. All Auditors are appreciated.

Special designations and insignia are to be developed to
distinguish the Auditor from others and signalize his class.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:sb.js
Copyright c 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

********

07. BPL  17 MAY 71RA r. 13 NOV 72 r. 10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions


B O A R D P O L I C Y L E T T E R

17 MAY 1971 RA

ISSUE II RA

REVISED 13 NOVEMBER 1972

REVISED & REISSUED 10 JUNE 1974 AS BPL

CANCELS HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 MAY 1971R
ISSUE II SAME TITLE

Remimeo 
All Staff 
All Students


STUDY POINTS AND CONDITIONS

(Revises and replaces HCO PL 25 Oct 70
of same title for all checksheets)

GOES INTO EFFECT WEEK ENDING 27 JUNE 1974.

This revised issue has been designed to even out earlier
inequities which gave artificial surges and slumps in
students' graphs, and adds points for handling
misunderstoods to further reward application of Study Tech.

The following point system is the standard point system and
is to be used on all Scientology and Dianetics Courses. It
cancels all previous point systems.

A point system is used so that students may accurately
measure their progress through a course. It further
provides a quantitative measurement of the production of a
course, Academy or Org.

The system itself is based on (1) how long a particular
study action takes and (2) the type of action it is. Thus
the practical is more heavily weighted than the theory,
since the purpose of study is application.

ALL POINTS MUST BE EARNED.

The point system assumes that the student knows and can
apply all the data for which he has gotten points. (See HCO
PL 26 May 1961 "Quality Counts".)

PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON TOUGH EXCELLENT TRS AND METERING AND
UNDERSTANDING OF AUDITORS CODE IS REQUIRED.

SUPERLITERATES (those who have completed PRD) count their
points exactly the same as others. Eg. .an item marked
starrate on a checksheet is so counted by the SUPERLITERATE
even though not checked out by another.

STUDY ACTION  -------------------  POINTS

0. Misunderstood word from         1 point per word.
materials defined and cleared.

or

Word defined and cleared           3 points per word.
on the PRD

1. Any written material (except    O-rate 3 points per page
as noted otherwise below).         *-rate 5 points per page

2. Tapes                           O-rate 60 (60 min tape)
                                   O-rate 90 (90 min tape)
                                   *-rate 75 (60 min tape)
                                   *-rate 100 (90 min tape)


3. Clay demonstrations (only       25
credited if done precisely
per HCO B 11 Oct 67 "Clay
Table Training". Demos must
be of good large size and show
what's being demonstrated.
Points are counted per demo
rather than per item on check-
sheet where any one item re-
quired more than one demo.)

4. Essays                         10

5. Study LRH C/Sed Sessions       10 per session

6. TRs (Wherever TRs are done,the
following is required):

OT TR-O to major stable win       50 per hour plus
                                  50 for passing

TR-O to a major stable win
nonbullbaited pass.               50 per hour plus
                                 100 for passing

TR-O Bullbaited to a major        50 per hour plus
stable win                        50 for passing

Other TRs to 10 unflunked         60 each
consecutive actions. Each
previous TR to be in.

TR 101                            25

TR 102 (All done thoroughly.      50

TR 103 All TRs to be in.)         75

TR 104                           100

7. E-Meter Drills (except for     15 per drill
the following)

E-Meter Drills 17, 20, 21, 26     25 per drill

Instant Read and Assessment       50 per drill
Drills

Dating drills                    120 per drill


8. Doll Drills - All thoroughly   30
done to a good pass - thoroughly
done with TRs in.

Bullbaited Drills coached to      75
a flubless pass.


9. Films                         O-rate same as for tapes
                                 *-rate same as for tapes


10. Codes and Axioms- To         O-rate 1 per code or Axiom
be thoroughly under-             *-rate 10 per code or Axiom
stood. If clay demos
done, the clay demo
points apply.

11. Scales - To be               O-rate 15 per scale
thoroughly understood.           *-rate 25 per scale
If clay demos done,
the clay demo points
apply.

12. Charts                       *-rate 75
                                 O-rate 25

1 column of a chart or           *-rate 15
1 level                          O-rate 10


13. Student Auditing
requirements:

Flunked Session                  0
Not Flunked Session             60 per auditing hr
Well Done Session              100 per auditing hr
Very Well Done Session         120 per auditing hr

14. Student Folder Error        10 per session
Summaries

Student PC Program -           100
correct and accepted.

Dianetic Flow table            100


15. Student C/S - correct and   15 per C/S
accepted. (includes session
admin time)

16. Coaching another student   same points as student
through a drill                for that drill

Completing a student fully     500 point bonus -
on Dianetics or on Ex-         provided student
panded Grade                   delivered at a
                               minimum rate of 25
                               WDAHs in the chair per
                               week in delivering the
                               grade.

Coaching another student       0
but failure to complete
to a pass


17. Twin Checkouts - not       5 per checkout given
coaching                       whether flunked or
                               passed

M3 on another student          3 points for each
                               word found and cleared

18. Official Examinations      200 for exam passed
                                   or
                               100 for attest

19. Specialist Training -      60 points per hour
practical, not other-
wise covered.

ADDITIONAL:

A. Hat checkouts, etc.         follow study points system
                               for individual items

B. Full Org Board drawn        120
up and posted - for
any purpose.


STUDENT CONDITIONS

FULL TIME STUDY = 8 hours a day, 7 days a week.

PART TIME STUDY = 2 1/2 hours a day, 7 days a week.


CONDITION     POINTS          POINTS
              PART TIME       FULL TIME

POWER         1800 or above   5600 or above

AFFLUENCE     1600 - 1799     5000 - 5599

NORMAL        1400 - 1599     4500 - 4999

EMERGENCY     1200 - 1399     4000 - 4499

DANGER        1000 - 1199     3400 - 3999

NON-EXISTENCE Less than 1000  Less than 3400


NOTE: The trend of the student's stat graph is always
taken into account per HCO PL 3 October 1970
" Stat Interpretation ".

Revised by
Training & Services Aide

Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTOTRS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY

BDCS:LRH:RS:rs 
Copyright c 1971, 1972, 1974 
by L. Ron Hubbard 
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 

********

08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 MAY 1965

Qual & Tech Divs
ALL HATS
HCO Div
ALL HATS

Remimeo 
Sthil Cl VII Course 
Students
Sthil Staff 
Ethics Hats 


PROCESSING

Since 1950 we have had an iron bound rule that we didn't
leave pcs in trouble just to end a session.

For fifteen years we have always continued a session that
found the pc in trouble and I myself have audited a pc for
nine additional hours, all night long in fact, just to get
the pc through.

Newer auditors, not trained in the stern school of running
engrams, must learn this all over again.

It doesn't matter whether the auditor has had a policy on
this or notone would think that common decency would be
enough as to leave a pc in the middle of a secondary or an
engram and just coolly end the session is pretty cruel.
Some do it because they are startled or afraid and "Rabbit"
(run away by ending the session).

Auditors who end a process or change it when it has turned
on a heavy somatic are likewise ignorant.

WHAT TURNS IT ON WILL TURN IT OFF.

This is the oldest rule in auditing.

Of course people get into secondaries and engrams, go
through misemotion and session because things are running
out. To end off a process or a session because of the clock
is to ignore the real purpose of auditing. The oldest rules
we have are

(a) GET THE PC THROUGH IT.

(b) WHAT TURNS IT ON WILL TURN IT OFF.

(c) THE WAY OUT IS THE WAY THROUGH.

These now are expressed as POLICY.

A falsified auditor's report is also subject to a Court of Ethics.

Any auditor violating this policy letter is liable to an
immediate Court of Ethics convened within 24 hours of the
offence or as soon as is urgently possible.

Auditing at all levels works well when it is done by the book.

The purpose of Ethics is to open the way for and get in Tech.



Then we can do our job.

THERE IS NO MODERN PROCESS THAT WILL NOT WORK WHEN EXACTLY

APPLIED.

Therefore in the eyes of Ethics all auditing failures are
Ethics failuresPTS, Suppressive Persons as pcs, or
non-compliance with tech for auditors.

And the first offence an auditor can commit is ceasing to
audit when he is most needed by his pc.

Hence it is the first most important consideration of
Ethics to prevent such occurrences.

Then we'll make happy pcs, Releases and Clears.

L RON HUBBARD

LRH:nt:rd
Copyright c 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

********


